I’ve been thinking a bit more about the congruence (or lack of) between IT and the business. In particular within organisations where IT is a shared support function, in-house, catering for all things IT.
It’s fine to theorise and talk in generalities regarding the principles of ensuring that IT is aligned with the strategic direction of the business, but at the end of the day a strategy is as good or as poor as the execution of it.
So the real key is looking at the grass roots. Right down in the guts of it, at the frontline where the rubber really hits the road. On the frontline is where ultimately execution plays out, and the one area that is generally not considered with equal planning vigour and thought as compared to higher levels where strategies are formulated, defined and planned to be executed.
It seems that ideas are usually confined to a small set of senior management who in theory have an in-depth insight into the direction of an organisation and as such decide on actions that put form and shape to these ideas, which ultimately produce tangible outcomes that serve the purpose of the organisation.
This is great and it’s probably how it should be (another post to debate this one), but it just doesn’t seem complete. What is missing from this? I’m glad I asked. What’s missing is the input from the grass roots level. The guys at the frontline who are immersed in the technologies, the trends, the possibilities! The guys that have an in depth understanding of the technology tool sets and the potentials that can be created with these tools.
There are massive changes going on at the moment in the development tools made available both in the openshare and proprietary software market. Tools that allow the generation of very smart software applications that do just about anything, blending web, desktop, server, mobile, voice, data and everything else imaginable. An even more interesting aspect is the ever increasing blending of web2.0 elements and more traditional back office elements, via awesome rich user interface capabilities. There are learning curves with these tools and technologies, but the guys on the frontline know them, learn them, and adopt them.
Frontline guys know who these tools can be used to produce rich, interactive and relevant applications that not only enhance a business user’s productivity and experience, but also may redefine job processes all together.
SO my question in this post is how do you source the wealth of knowledge at the grassroots level? How do you get ideas generated from the frontline out from under the hidden IT rocks, and make them part of your overall IT strategy and consequently the organisational strategy?
I agree that successful IT and business congruence is a two-way street. Business has needs which strategy is defined against. At the same time IT has a responsibility for innovation within the boundaries of the organisation’s business focus and HAS TO get the innovative ideas on the table no matter how left field they might be. So how do you do it? How do you do it in a way that’s productive, sustainable, relevant and executable?
One idea I have (and I’m about to experiment with it at work) is to mandate 10% of my teams time to “innovation” activities. Clear boundaries need to be outlined, but not overdone stifling the creativity; enough to make sure the output is relevant to our business. These ideas can then be posted on-line on our intranet (in a think-place area) where each person can debate the pros and cons of the idea, as well as offer their views to better shape an embryonic idea. From these pool of ideas some gems HAVE TO be generated. Tying this work to their KPI’s to incent my team will mean they “need” to do it, but not at the risk of making it a chore vs something they love doing and being part of.
This is a simple idea that I’m still nutting out but I’m really interested on what you think.
Sagart!
Tell me what I want and I’ll tell you what you need!
8 10 2007Comments : 4 Comments »
Categories : HCM, IT Approach, IT strategy, Innovation
GAP – and I’m not talking fashion!
16 08 2007There’s a lot going on at the moment from an IT perspective. An awful lot in fact; all these emerging technologies hitting us from left, right and centre; in fact from all directions.
From the latest technologies promoting social collaboration of information, the whole web 2.0 phenomenon, the tidal wave shift of web and web technologies becoming a staple in the the normal IT diet, to the general shift of web based technologies now being a mainstream component in any IT strategy.
What intrigues me the most is that irrespective of what patterns, practices, technologies, new waves/trends/hype curves that exist the fundamental problem remains. IT is meant to support business process yet the perpetual failure of IT delivering business value remains. The GAP!
Talk to 100 IT professionals from any discipline, and all 100 will quote you “…of course! IT is there to support the business. We’re here to make sure the business can meet its objectives…we make sure they have the tools to do their job!”.
Yet what I have witnessed throughout my career in the IT industry (across varying industries) is the continuous failure of IT solutions to meet business need. It’s just a perpetual failure. Why?
We all acknowledge there is an obvious GAP between business strategy and tying in the appropriate IT strategy to enable the ultimate objective, the business objective! Sounds simple, right? Well…yes it is simple. But why do we fail, and not just on the odd occasion but continuously?
Microsoft has released a whole bunch of tools that truly are great tools/platforms to create amazing applications, with all the marketing of promises of delivering value to the business in many ways and at many levels. But at the end of the day these are yet another set of tools, that will no doubt keep the keen geek (myself included
very happy playing!
(The same is true for open source stuff – really the technology stack is almost irrelevant outside of a capital/operational investment perspective)
The GAP, between business need and IT delivering tools and methods that assist the *business process* still remains wide. What we end up with is business process always having to morph to varying degrees in order to satisfy IT limitations.
How do you bridge the gap? And I’m sick of text book answers which work in fluffy-lala-never -never-land but will with almost 99.999% certainty always compromise business potential. (I was tempted to say five 9’s)
There is a real GAP and it’s got nothing to do with the technology available, instead how the technology is tied into a sound business strategy.
Comments : 16 Comments »
Categories : Blah blah blah, IT Approach, IT Business Process, IT strategy
Sagart’s fully two 0′d
29 07 2007No half measures on my end. over the last few months I’ve gone from the occasional surf on the web, to now having all this integrating components coming out of my *whazoo*
i am fully web 2.0′d
Facebook? – got one
Twitter? – yeah so i’m penning down mental *crap?* stuff
Blog? – …ahem…
SL? – Sagart’s been born
ok, what else do i need?
de.licio.us?
flicker?
myspace? – naaghhh, out of date now
don’t get me wrong, i love this stuff, but are we on the verge of ridiculousness, or on the verge of a new communication paradigm?
does this smell like 1996? or is it natural e-volution?
Comments : 9 Comments »
Categories : Uncategorized