a town like alice

19 10 2008
tali by salt pan

tali by salt pan

i should say, one of the things i really luv is australian aboriginal art. Not all styles grab my perceptive stimulants so to speak, but some are just visually delicious. 

The style i luv is the one which combines abstract methods with traditional aboriginal ones.

 

And there’s no one that does it better than Alice Nampitjinpa; chk out her bio

 

here are some of her awesome and inspiring works.

tali-in-the-rainy-season

tali tali

tali tali 2

rockholes near talaalpi swamp

rockholes near talaalpi swamp

sandhill country - My Favourite!!!

sandhill country - My Favourite!!!

tali

tali





i wish i knew

18 10 2008

I wish I knew
What to do
How to see
And push on through

To take a chance
To risk it all
And find myself
Wanting more

To just let go
And jump right in
Change my mind
And change my skin

To be bold
And not afraid
This I wish
I wish I knew





Life is Beautiful

17 10 2008

i heard someone say today
life is beautiful
if you overcome
the very thing which binds you

but the beauty hidden deep
within this life of mine
can only be reached
with an overcoming mind

the hand that shaped and moulded me
full of fear and wonder
with gentle love it guides me
so i overcome

life is only beautiful 
when in you myself i find

life is only beautiful 
when in you myself i find





spiritual journey

17 08 2008

don’t know if it’s just the winter time blues or not, but i’ve just been in a bit of a rut lately. There’s no particular reason why, just have been that’s all.

Anyhow, that lead to some conversational exchanging between moi and the wonderful webby chick i know. And the suggestion was made by the wonderful webby chick to “…go on a trip and find out what u should be doing…” to which i replied “…what? like a…spiritual journey?”, and was met with a yes prefixed with 3 seconds delay and a gaze that was staring slightly to the left of me and just above my head height.

Well, that immediately reminded my of the 1988 U2 movie Rattle and Hum. Specifically the scene where Larry Mullen Jr responds to an interviewers question asking him what the flick is about, in his thick Irish accent, “it’s a musical journey!”.

So, a spiritual journey hey?

And that got me thinking. does one need to travel out to somewhere, ANYWHERE, go on a quest to find TEH something? go on a trip with the sole purpose of EXPECTING an answer to the very thing that they don’t even know what it is they’re questioning?

And, let’s just assume for hypothetical’s sake (top bloke he is) I do go on this “spiritual journey” (please use irish accent when saying that, it feels better). There’s a few things that need to be asked just there.
1. Where do I go?
2. What do I DO there once i get to ANSWER 1?
3. So I start doing ANSWER 2 and then how will I know the answer when I come across it?
4. And assuming i come across ANSWER 3, what then?

Its a “spiritual journey”!

Ok. I need to understand what frame of mind I would need to be in? Do I need to be expectant of an answer? Do i need to start out seeking (for something I don’t really know) and expect that I will find it? Seek and ye shall find! (Irish accent optional).

What would you do? allow urself to be immersed in experience? spirituality? both? circumstance? is it ok to go to the chosen place with no clue of where to go, who to seek, nor what to do?

I know these words may come across as nonsensical scattered thoughts and in some ways showcase my current state.

It’s a musical journey says Larry, only now i need to find out what instrument to play, and the scariest part, is finding out if I can play?

And me thinks the latter question might be the root of the problem.





saggy dna

9 08 2008

So i jumped on PersonalDNA and took the 12 page test; too much time on my hands i hear no-one say. well, no; just wanted to play with yet another program using (claiming is more accurate) AI to assess my responses to a bunch of questions, which, behind the scenes, deep down where the rats and guinea pigs are doing loops and all, each response denotes a particular characteristic or behaviour. Each different type of trait and/or behaviour is tallied up at the end, and the ones that rank highest map to a prefab profile. Mine being teh benevolent leader,

with pretty colour maps; buggered if im going to work it out

Key findings:

1. I’m 90% masculine, 10% femine (tg for the confirmation)

2. I put a high trust in others

3. I am overtly extroverted

4. I’m empathetic, but only slighlty - :-(

and there u go.





I know what they’re doing is wrong…but…look at their faces!

4 11 2007

I’m stepping away from IT for a sec, and commenting on a news paper article I read recently.

The article appeared in The Age newspaper on Oct 31, titled:

“China puts clamp on shady goods manufacturers”


In brief the article talks about Chinese officials clamping down on “shady” goods and food manufacturing operators, due to health and safety issues.

I agreed with the article, as our H&S is very important, and with global markets in full swing, a lot of our consumables come from China.

But then I looked carefully at the photo that accompanied the article.



“A Chinese man and his wife plead with a Government inspector not to confiscate their equipment used to make soy products in Wuhan, central China.”
Photo: AFP quoted from The Age article

I know what they’re doing is wrong…but…look at their faces!

My heart broke…





Tell me what I want and I’ll tell you what you need!

8 10 2007

I’ve been thinking a bit more about the congruence (or lack of) between IT and the business. In particular within organisations where IT is a shared support function, in-house, catering for all things IT.

It’s fine to theorise and talk in generalities regarding the principles of ensuring that IT is aligned with the strategic direction of the business, but at the end of the day a strategy is as good or as poor as the execution of it.

So the real key is looking at the grass roots. Right down in the guts of it, at the frontline where the rubber really hits the road. On the frontline is where ultimately execution plays out, and the one area that is generally not considered with equal planning vigour and thought as compared to higher levels where strategies are formulated, defined and planned to be executed.

It seems that ideas are usually confined to a small set of senior management who in theory have an in-depth insight into the direction of an organisation and as such decide on actions that put form and shape to these ideas, which ultimately produce tangible outcomes that serve the purpose of the organisation.

This is great and it’s probably how it should be (another post to debate this one), but it just doesn’t seem complete. What is missing from this? I’m glad I asked. What’s missing is the input from the grass roots level. The guys at the frontline who are immersed in the technologies, the trends, the possibilities! The guys that have an in depth understanding of the technology tool sets and the potentials that can be created with these tools.

There are massive changes going on at the moment in the development tools made available both in the openshare and proprietary software market. Tools that allow the generation of very smart software applications that do just about anything, blending web, desktop, server, mobile, voice, data and everything else imaginable. An even more interesting aspect is the ever increasing blending of web2.0 elements and more traditional back office elements, via awesome rich user interface capabilities. There are learning curves with these tools and technologies, but the guys on the frontline know them, learn them, and adopt them.

Frontline guys know who these tools can be used to produce rich, interactive and relevant applications that not only enhance a business user’s productivity and experience, but also may redefine job processes all together.

SO my question in this post is how do you source the wealth of knowledge at the grassroots level? How do you get ideas generated from the frontline out from under the hidden IT rocks, and make them part of your overall IT strategy and consequently the organisational strategy?

I agree that successful IT and business congruence is a two-way street. Business has needs which strategy is defined against. At the same time IT has a responsibility for innovation within the boundaries of the organisation’s business focus and HAS TO get the innovative ideas on the table no matter how left field they might be. So how do you do it? How do you do it in a way that’s productive, sustainable, relevant and executable?

One idea I have (and I’m about to experiment with it at work) is to mandate 10% of my teams time to “innovation” activities. Clear boundaries need to be outlined, but not overdone stifling the creativity; enough to make sure the output is relevant to our business. These ideas can then be posted on-line on our intranet (in a think-place area) where each person can debate the pros and cons of the idea, as well as offer their views to better shape an embryonic idea. From these pool of ideas some gems HAVE TO be generated. Tying this work to their KPI’s to incent my team will mean they “need” to do it, but not at the risk of making it a chore vs something they love doing and being part of.

This is a simple idea that I’m still nutting out but I’m really interested on what you think.

Sagart!





GAP - and I’m not talking fashion!

16 08 2007

There’s a lot going on at the moment from an IT perspective. An awful lot in fact; all these emerging technologies hitting us from left, right and centre; in fact from all directions.

From the latest technologies promoting social collaboration of information, the whole web 2.0 phenomenon, the tidal wave shift of web and web technologies becoming a staple in the the normal IT diet, to the general shift of web based technologies now being a mainstream component in any IT strategy.

What intrigues me the most is that irrespective of what patterns, practices, technologies, new waves/trends/hype curves that exist the fundamental problem remains. IT is meant to support business process yet the perpetual failure of IT delivering business value remains. The GAP!

Talk to 100 IT professionals from any discipline, and all 100 will quote you “…of course! IT is there to support the business. We’re here to make sure the business can meet its objectives…we make sure they have the tools to do their job!”.

Yet what I have witnessed throughout my career in the IT industry (across varying industries) is the continuous failure of IT solutions to meet business need. It’s just a perpetual failure. Why?

We all acknowledge there is an obvious GAP between business strategy and tying in the appropriate IT strategy to enable the ultimate objective, the business objective! Sounds simple, right? Well…yes it is simple. But why do we fail, and not just on the odd occasion but continuously?

Microsoft has released a whole bunch of tools that truly are great tools/platforms to create amazing applications, with all the marketing of promises of delivering value to the business in many ways and at many levels. But at the end of the day these are yet another set of tools, that will no doubt keep the keen geek (myself included ;) very happy playing!

(The same is true for open source stuff - really the technology stack is almost irrelevant outside of a capital/operational investment perspective)

The GAP, between business need and IT delivering tools and methods that assist the *business process* still remains wide. What we end up with is business process always having to morph to varying degrees in order to satisfy IT limitations.

How do you bridge the gap? And I’m sick of text book answers which work in fluffy-lala-never -never-land but will with almost 99.999% certainty always compromise business potential. (I was tempted to say five 9’s)

There is a real GAP and it’s got nothing to do with the technology available, instead how the technology is tied into a sound business strategy.





Sagart’s fully two 0′d

29 07 2007

No half measures on my end. over the last few months I’ve gone from the occasional surf on the web, to now having all this integrating components coming out of my *whazoo*

i am fully web 2.0′d

Facebook? - got one
Twitter? - yeah so i’m penning down mental *crap?* stuff
Blog? - …ahem…
SL? - Sagart’s been born

ok, what else do i need?

de.licio.us?
flicker?
myspace? - naaghhh, out of date now

don’t get me wrong, i love this stuff, but are we on the verge of ridiculousness, or on the verge of a new communication paradigm?

does this smell like 1996? or is it natural e-volution?